Nature
Trichophyton interdigitale (previously classified as T. mentagrophytes var. interdigitale) is a dermatophyte fungus and the second most common cause of dermatophytosis in humans, after T. rubrum. Dermatophyte fungi are filamentous and keratinophilic. The differentiation of the various species belonging to the T. mentagrophytes complex, including T. interdigitale, has historically been challenging, as identification through morphology and physiological characteristics was unreliable (1-3).
The T. mentagrophytes complex fungi have previously been classified according to host specificities, either anthropophilic (including T. mentagrophytes var. interdigitale and T. mentagrophytes var. goetzii) or zoophilic (including T. mentagrophytes var. granulosum in rodents and T. mentagrophytes var. quinckeanum in mice). However, the emergence of molecular analysis has resulted in a re-ordering of the classification of the T. mentagrophytes complex. T. mentagrophytes now is a synonym only for the zoophilic T. mentagrophytes var. quinckeanum. Whereas T. mentagrophytes var. interdigitale and T. mentagrophytes var. goetzii, as well as T. mentagrophytes var. nodulare and T. mentagrophytes var. granulosum are now all considered a single species, T. interdigitale, due to being genetically indistinguishable. Different strains of T. interdigitale can be either anthropophilic or zoophilic (2, 4). This reclassification has been formally adopted. From a human clinical perspective, T. interdigtale is the cause of non-inflammatory tinea pedis and unguium, whilst T. mentagrophytes is isolated from cases of tinea corporis, tinea cruris, tinea capitis and tinea faciei (5, 6).
It is possible to distinguish the anthropophilic and zoophilic strains of T. interdigitale morphologically. A difference in the quantity of conidiophores and conidia has been described. The zoophilic strains produce more conidia, resulting in a granular appearance to the colonies with a beige hue. Whereas the anthropophilic strains have a reduced number of conidia and a cottony appearance (4). This difference in clinical, epidemiological and virulence properties between the granular and downy strains has been recognized for over 60 years (7). Sequence analysis of the internal transcribed spacer region of ribosomal DNA is the gold standard for differentiation of dermatophyte species and can be obtained directly from hair, skin or nail samples (4). Correct species identification is essential to select the most effective antimycotic therapy (2).
T. mentagrophytes var interdigitalis is a pathogenic fungus that causes dermatophytosis in humans and animals and is considered a zoonosis. It is predominantly found in cases of tinea pedis and onychomycosis, where a prevalence of between 1.5–55.4% has been reported (8). Furthermore, a T. interdigitale (mentagrophytes) syndrome has been described, characterized as a chronic dermatophytosis that is distinct from other forms of tenia (4). Drug resistance of some strains of T. interdigitale has been reported. One recent study from India described a resistance rate to terbinafine of 32% amongst 63 T. interdigitale isolates (9, 10).
Taxonomy
Taxonomic tree of Trichophyton (Fukutomi & Taniguchi, 2015)
|
---|
Domain
|
Eukaryote
|
Kingdom
|
Fungi
|
Phylum
|
Ascomycota
|
Subphylum
|
Pezizomycotine
|
Class
|
Eurotiomycetes
|
Order
|
Onygenales
|
Family
|
Arthrodermataceae
|
Genus
|
Trichophyton
|
Taxonomic tree of Trichophyton (Fukutomi & Taniguchi, 2015)
|
---|
Since the reclassification of the T. mentagrophytes complex into T. interdigitale and T.mentagrophytes, the differentiation of these species remains challenging and is achieved by sequencing the Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) region of the rDNA. ITS analysis has identified 9 different genotypes of T.interdigitale and T.mentagrophytes, which are associated with geographic origin. ITS Type I and ITS Type II are T. interdigitale genotypes and ITS type III – IX are T. mentagrophytes. It suspected that the challenges in distinguishing these dermatophyte infections resulted in their being used interchangeably in the literature (6, 11).