clear search
Search
Search Suggestions
Recent searches Clear History
Contact Us

Whole Allergen

o216 Cannabis

o216 Cannabis Scientific Information

Type:

Whole Allergen

Display Name:

Cannabis

Route of Exposure:

Inhalation, ingestion, cutaneous

Latin Name:

Cannabis sativa

Other Names:

Hemp, grass, weed, marijuana

Summary

Considered one of the oldest domesticated multi-purpose crops, an important source of fiber, food and medicine, cannabis has been used for millennia in spiritual, religious and recreational activities due to its psychoactive properties. Cannabis is a generic term for different preparations derived from C. sativa that contain high levels of psychoactive substances like cannabinoids, particularly delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC). Despite the widespread use of cannabis, reports on cannabis allergy remain rare – possibly due to very low reporting (most likely due to varying legality) or difficulty distinguishing due to cross-reactivity caused by cannabis-fruit/vegetable syndrome. Inhalation of cannabis smoke is its most common use; however, cannabis-related allergic symptoms are not generally limited to the route of exposure. For example, cannabis smoking can trigger respiratory, cutaneous and gastrointestinal symptoms, potentially an artefact of recreational cannabis users preparing and handling their cigarettes. Most reports describe immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions, typically with a rapid onset of symptoms ranging from mild, isolated reactions to generalized, severe reactions.

Allergen          

Nature

Cannabis sativa is an annual, dioecious and anemophilous flowering plant that sheds highly buoyant pollen grains (23–28 μm in diameter) in late summer to early autumn (1, 2). Considered one of the oldest domesticated multi-purpose crops, C. sativa is an important source of fiber, food and medicine, and has been used for millennia in spiritual, religious and recreational activities due to its psychoactive properties (1, 3-7).

Cannabis is a generic term for different preparations (e.g., marijuana, weed, hashish) derived from C. sativa that contain high levels of psychoactive substances like cannabinoids, particularly delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) (8-11). Industrial hemp and medical cannabis are both genetically distinct and can be differentiated by their THC content: most hemp samples have a total THC content of 0.3% or less, whereas medical cannabis samples can contain upwards of 10% THC (4, 6, 12-14).

The legality, recreational and medical use of cannabis varies widely by country and region but remains largely prohibited internationally (11, 15). In recent years, cannabis for medical and/or recreational use has been decriminalized to some extent in a number of jurisdictions (e.g. the Netherlands, Uruguay, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Canada and some US states) (3, 13, 15). Increased prevalence of cannabis use may be a consequence of this new public health strategy as well as recent trends promoting ecological consciousness and healthy foods such as hemp seed (2, 3, 5, 6, 9, 15, 16).

Taxonomy

Cannabis sativa L. belongs to the plant Family Cannabaceae (hemp), Order Rosales (17), and is genetically complex with significant variability in phenotype and sex expression (4). The taxonomy is disputed, with some suggesting a monotypic classification with several subspecies of C. sativa, and others suggesting three distinct species (C. sativa, C. indica, and C. ruderalis) (4, 5), which can themselves be further broken down into wild and domesticated varieties with numerous hybrids (4).

Figure 1: Taxonomy of C. sativa (17)

Tissue

The biochemistry of Cannabis is complex, with at least 118 cannabinoids and over 400 similarly described constituents, the most well known of which are THC and cannabidiol (CBD) (5, 9, 11, 18). Phytocannabinoids accumulate in the secretory cavity of the glandular trichomes, which largely occur in female flowers and in most aerial parts of the plant, but have also been detected in lower quantities in seeds, roots and pollen (7, 19). Generally, the concentration of these compounds depends on tissue type, plant age, variety, growth conditions (nutrition, humidity, light level), harvest time and storage conditions (12).

Epidemiology  

Worldwide distribution (of the disease)

Despite the widespread use of Cannabis, reports on cannabis allergy remain rare – possibly due to very low reporting (most likely due to varying legality) or difficulty distinguishing due to cross-reactivity caused by cannabis-fruit/vegetable syndrome – and generally deal with small numbers of cases (3, 9, 10, 20, 21). The quality and availability of evidence is limited by the extent of published literature, which is particularly relevant given that extent of cannabis legalization worldwide is fairly limited, which precludes extensive research (2, 7, 15, 16, 22). In addition, possible sensitization to drugs (including cannabis) has not been widely considered, as drug reactions are generally attributed to toxic causes and allergic hypersensitivity to immunological causes, with the two seen as mutually exclusive (22).

The first report of cannabis allergy dates to 1971 when a young housewife experienced an anaphylactic reaction after smoking a cannabis-containing cigarette (23). Only about 10% of cannabis users seek specific treatment, probably due to the illegality of its use and also to neurobehavioral alterations such as bias recall due to impaired memory (9, 19). However, it is likely that increased cannabis availability and exposure (both as a drug and a food) will coincide with a rise in adverse events including cannabis-related allergies with detrimental effects on health and quality of life [(3, 5, 10, 15).

Risk factors

An increasing number of reports describe mild to severe plant-derived food allergies associated with cannabis allergy, a phenomenon called the cannabis-fruit/vegetable syndrome, mainly attributed to sensitization to Can s 3, a nonspecific lipid transfer protein (nsLTP) from C. sativa (8, 10, 20). NsLTPs are heat stable allergens widely distributed through the plant kingdom which show extensive in vitro and in vivo cross-reactivity (10, 20). Of note, sensitization with cannabis-fruit/vegetable syndrome is bidirectional, i.e. sensitization to nsLTP could cause subsequent sensitization to Cannabis (5, 22).

Environmental characteristics  

Living environment

Exposure to cannabis extends beyond personal recreational use and includes secondhand exposure, oral ingestion, aeroallergen/pollen contact, and cutaneous contact (5, 8, 10, 11). Secondhand cannabis exposure in the home environment, expected to increase significantly as personal cannabis use becomes legalized in more areas, has been suggested to contribute to difficult-to-control asthma in children (24) and can lead to detectable levels of psychoactive substances and their metabolites in blood, urine and oral fluids of exposed individuals (11, 25).

Contact with hemp in a household is not likely to be unusual: industrial hemp is used to make more than 25,000 products ranging from textiles, clothing, rope, home furnishings, oils, cosmetics, personal care and pharmaceuticals, as well as a wide range of food and beverages, nutritional supplements and alternative protein sources (4, 6).

Worldwide distribution (of the species)

Cannabis is by far the most commonly-used drug worldwide (26) and is consumed in almost all countries, regardless of legalization status (9). The demand for cannabis involves deliberate year-round growth in climates and environments that would otherwise be inhospitable (1).

In 2018, there were an estimated 192 million recreational users of cannabis within the previous 12 months, corresponding to 3.9% of the global population aged 15-64 years; nearly 10% of these individuals were reported to be daily or near-daily users (26). Within this age group, the highest rates of past-year cannabis use were recorded in North America (14.6%), Australia and New Zealand (10.6%) and West/Central Africa (9.3%) (26). In Europe, the life-time estimates of cannabis use among adults ranged from 0.4% in Turkey to 22.1% in France (9).

Industrial hemp has recently been legalized in many regions and now forms an emerging market with growing popularity among consumers due to its high yield, superior fiber content and nutritional profile, as well as its favorable sustainable agricultural profile compared to other crops (e.g. cotton) (4, 6, 7). Approximately half the global industrial hemp fiber supply is produced in China, however cultivation licenses have been issued across Canada and the USA in recent years, and research is underway across North America and Europe to develop high-yielding varieties across different growing regions (4).

Route of exposure       

Main

Inhalation of cannabis smoke is its most common use (9), but it can also be inhaled as resin, vaporized, taken orally or applied to the skin or mucus membranes (1, 9, 27). A typical marijuana cigarette is produced from 1 g of C. sativa leaves, but can also include the whole plant including flowers, leaves, seeds, roots and stems (9). Marijuana is smoked without filters, and users inhale larger volumes, more deeply and at higher temperatures than tobacco (9).

More than 2,000 compounds are produced by pyrolysis during smoking of cannabis which altogether contribute to the unique pharmacological and toxicological profile of cannabis (11). Cannabis-related symptoms are not generally limited to the route of exposure, for example, cannabis smoking can trigger respiratory, cutaneous and gastrointestinal symptoms, potentially an artefact of recreational cannabis users preparing and handling their cigarettes (3, 19, 20).

Of note, the dose-response effect of cannabis exposure is difficult to evaluate due to a great variation in the amounts and strains of the plant used in a cigarette, as well as the wide variety of methods in which cannabis is smoked, all of which alters the characteristics of the inhaled smoke and health consequences (9). In addition, cannabis farms and plantations often use a large number of pesticides and other irritable substances, and can be located in poorly ventilated, hot and humid environments which are ideal for fungal proliferation (2, 3). As such, respiratory and cutaneous irritability may not always be linked to an allergic cause and it can be highly challenging to differentiate symptoms mediated by allergy from nonspecific irritability (2, 3).

Other

Estimates suggest that by 2021 over 300,000 workers will be employed in growing, harvesting, processing and distributing Cannabis (28). Occupational cannabis contact can elicit type 1 hypersensitivity reactions ranging from mild local reactions to life-threatening anaphylaxis (1, 3, 19), and many hemp workers have been demonstrated to exhibit high levels of serum IgE to hemp (28). Industrial hemp dust exposure has been implicated in byssinosis, an occupational obstructive (small airway) lung disease associated with organic textile dust exposure in work environments (1, 13). Additional occupations at risk of cannabis exposure include law enforcement personnel, laboratory technicians and dispensary workers (13).

There have been only limited reports of hempseed allergy. In a small study among 15 patients presenting with allergic reaction to hempseed, cannabis, or both, which investigated the coexistence of cannabis and hempseed allergy, 10 were sensitized to cannabis. There was also evidence of further coexisting allergies. 12 patients were atopic (seasonal allergic rhinitis, asthma, eczema or food allergy) and five had food allergies tested by skin-prick test (29).

Hempseed, hemp oil and a hulled form of the seed that is free from THC have become popular as a food product with possible benefits to health. In one case study of a 44-year-old man with a history of seasonal allergic rhinitis, mild asthma, and occasional use of marijuana but no food allergies experienced an allergic response upon visiting a restaurant specializing in hempseed ingredients. Upon exposure to cooking fumes and ingestion of foods prepared with hempseed, he experienced anaphylaxis; comprising ocular pruritus, urticaria on the scalp, axillae, and groin, alongside facial angioedema, dyspnea and dysphonia, requiring emergency treatment with epinephrine and antihistamines. Immunoblotting of serum demonstrated IgE binding to a protein extract of raw hulled and roasted unhulled hempseed used in the meal (30). 

Clinical Relevance        

Allergic diseases associated with C. sativa include allergic rhinitis, asthma, allergic conjunctivitis, eczema, food allergy, drug eruption, contact urticaria and anaphylaxis (1). Cannabis allergy can significantly impact quality of life, manifesting severe and generalized symptoms with extensive cross-reactions (3).

Most reports describe immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions, typically with a rapid onset of symptoms starting within 20-30 minutes after cannabis exposure (3). Symptoms range from mild, isolated reactions which can involve the upper airway (nasal and pharyngeal pruritus, lacrimation, nasal congestion and rhinitis), lower airway (cough, mild to severe dyspnea, wheezing and chest tightness), cardiovascular (hypotension, palpitations, vertigo), cutaneous (localized/generalized pruritus and urticaria, eczema and periorbital angioedema) and gastrointestinal (nausea, vomiting and abdominal cramping) systems to generalized, severe reactions and life-threatening anaphylaxis (1, 3, 10).

Seasonal and occupational exposure to C. sativa can be considered as a precipitating factor for acute asthma and allergic attacks in clinical practice (1, 9). Cannabis pollen contributes to the aerobiology wherever it grows wild, which can manifest a hay fever-like syndrome with symptoms of allergic rhinitis, conjunctivitis and asthma; this can be relevant in regions such as central India, urban Pakistan, southern Europe and parts of the United States (1, 3, 9).

Of note, contamination of marijuana samples with fungi such as Aspergillus and Penicillium species may put immunocompromised patients at risk for invasive disease. A case of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis has been observed in a patient with a contaminated marijuana supply (1).

Diagnostics sensitization

The illicit nature of Cannabis use can create barriers to accurate and clear patient communications (1, 10), however any physician suspecting a Cannabis allergy should attempt a detailed and thorough anamnesis focusing on the symptoms experienced during exposure, the type of exposure, the timeframe during which symptoms appear and subsequently disappear, and the presence of other environmental factors with the potential of eliciting allergic symptoms (3, 9, 13).

The “gold standard” in vivo diagnostic test for sensitization - a patient challenge with Cannabis - is hampered by legal restrictions in the majority of jurisdictions worldwide (1, 3, 13). To date, skin prick testing (SPT) for Cannabis allergy remains non-standardized, unvalidated and unreliable due to inherent differences in source material, extraction techniques, contaminants and additives (1, 3, 10, 13, 20).

Multiple authors have described using an in vitro specific IgE assay on patients’ sera using either crude cannabis/hemp extracts or purified/recombinant components [Reviewed in:(3)], however the only sIgE (industrial) hemp assay test currently available on the market is limited to research purposes only (3). Cannabis allergy has been diagnosed successfully via an in vitro basophil activation test (BAT) [Reviewed in:(3)]. While BAT is limited to research purposes, it  may exhibit better specificity than sIgE assays as it is an ex vivo technique that needs cross-linking on the basophil membrane to produce a positive result, whereas sIgE assays only detect IgE without looking at its function. However, it is important to note that diagnostics – including BAT – which are based on crude extracts can produce clinically irrelevant results (3). Also, BAT has a further limitation as it requires whole blood or isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

Prevention and therapy

Avoidance

Most reports advise avoidance of cannabis and all foods implicated in clinical cross-reactivity (1, 3, 10). Complete avoidance can be challenging in an occupational setting but may be necessary in the case of anaphylaxis (13). Avoidance may also be challenging due to cross-reactivity caused by cannabis-fruit/vegetable syndrome (3, 31). Careful consideration of crop locations may be indicated, for example Davidson et al. (2018) recommended avoiding growing hemp in regions known for thunderstorm asthma events because Cannabis pollen can be naturally dispersed over vast distances due to its small size (2, 10).

Therapy

Symptomatic treatment for cannabis-induced allergic rhino-conjunctivitis and asthma can include antihistamines, intranasal steroids, nasal decongestants, β-agonists or corticosteroids as indicated, while epinephrine auto-injectors should be prescribed for patients with a history of anaphylaxis (1).

A single case report describes successful desensitization for cannabis with omalizumab: an asthmatic police detective aged 29 years, with regular occupational cannabis exposure resulting in anaphylaxis, received four months of omalizumab therapy after which no anaphylaxis episodes were seen and only some cutaneous tingle remained on contact with cannabis (32).

Molecular aspects       

Allergenic molecules

Table 1. Allergens of C. sativa: adapted from(1, 3, 9, 13, 19, 33)

Main Allergen

Substance

kDa

Function

Cannabis sativa

[Potential] Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)

 

Psychoactive compound

Can s 2 profilin

9

 

Can s 3 (nonspecific lipid transfer protein [nsLTP])

9

Defense-related protein

[Potential] Ribulose-1,5-biphosphonate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO)

50

Photosynthetic enzyme

Can s 4 (oxygen-evolving enhancer protein 2 [OEEP2])

23

Photosynthetic enzyme

Can s 5 pathogenesis related protein 10 homolog

17.7

 

 

 

 

Main Allergen

Substance

kDa

Function

The best-studied and characterized Cannabis protein is Can s 3, due to its extensive cross-reactions with other nsLTPs across the plant kingdom (3, 34).

Armentia et al. (2014) demonstrated that 95.3% (124/130) of patients with a primary cannabis allergy were sensitized to purified Cannabis lipid transfer proteins (versus zero non-atopic healthy control patients and only one individual with asthma sensitized to pollen), and suggested that lipid transfer proteins may be responsible for primary Cannabis sensitization (35). In a case-control study of patients consulting for plant food allergies, 11/12 patients with cannabis allergy were sensitized to nsLTP (8). Both the severe phenotype and the extensive cross-reactivity associated with cannabis allergy can be attributed to the physicochemical properties of Can s 3 (20). However, while a major allergen, Can s 3 does not cover the entire IgE-reactivity profile of cannabis allergy and other cannabis allergens probably play a role (20, 36).

Can s 2, also known as profilin, and Can s 5, also known as pathogenesis related protein 10 homolog, have been investigated in a study of 45 patients in Northwestern Europe. 25 of these patients had cannabis allergy. Of these, sensitization to profilin was identified in 4 patients (16%), and 2 of 25 were sensitized to Can s 5. In patients with cannabis allergy, but without clear birch pollen allergy, sensitization to Can s 5 is most likely caused by a primary sensitization via C. sativa. The study identified the possibility of cross-reactivity between the two allergenic components, Can s 2 and Can s 5. These data suggest that Can s 2 and Can s 5 could play a role in cannabis allergy in the region (37).

Cross-reactivity

Apart from allergic symptoms reported from direct or indirect cannabis exposure, an increasing number of reports outline mild to severe plant-derived food allergies associated with Cannabis allergy [reviewed in(3, 8)]. Via the “cannabis-fruit/vegetable syndrome”, the nsLTP Can s 3 has been reported to cross-react with other nsLTPs including (ordered by sequence homology from highest to lowest): Mal d 3 (apple), 85%; Pru p 3 (peach), 85%; and Vit v 1 (grape), 85%; Sol l 3 (tomato), 84%; Nic t 1 (tobacco), 84%; Cor a 8 (hazelnut), 80%; Cit s 3 (citrus), 80%; Mus a 3 (banana), 80%; Hev b 12 (latex), 75%; Ara h9 (peanut), 70%; Tri a 14 (wheat), 68% [reviewed in:(10)]. Of note, nsLTPs sensitization can occur as a result of in vitro cross-reactivity to Can s 3 from taxonomically related or more distant sources without any previous Cannabis contact (20).

NsLTPs are widely distributed throughout the plant kingdom and show extensive in vitro and in vivo cross-reactivity (20). Can s 3 sensitization presents a risk of systemic reactions to plant-derived foods and cofactor-mediated reactions (e.g. reported plant-derived food allergies with a history of overt or severe, generalized reactions in the presence of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, alcohol, or physical exercise ) (20).

Can s 3 sensitization is not the only important allergen, so other cannabis allergens probably play a role in cross-reactivity (20).

Explained results

Allergen Information

Cannabis is a generic term for different preparations (e.g., marijuana, weed, hashish) derived from Cannabis sativa that contain high levels of psychoactive substances like cannabinoids, particularly delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) (8-11). Hemp and hemp products are also derived from Cannabis sativa, but contain a THC level of 0.3% or less (4). Exposure to cannabis extends beyond personal recreational use and includes second-hand exposure, oral ingestion, aeroallergen/pollen contact, and cutaneous contact (5, 8, 10, 11).

·                Clinical information

Allergic diseases associated with C. sativa include allergic rhinitis, asthma, allergic conjunctivitis, eczema, food allergy, drug eruption, contact urticaria and anaphylaxis (1). Symptoms range from mild, isolated reactions to generalized, severe reactions and life-threatening anaphylaxis (1, 3, 10). Cannabis allergy can significantly impact quality of life, manifesting severe and generalized symptoms (3).

Cross-reactivity

An increasing number of reports describe mild to severe plant-derived food allergies associated with cannabis allergy, a phenomenon called the cannabis-fruit/vegetable syndrome, mainly attributed to sensitization to Can s 3, a nonspecific lipid transfer protein (nsLTP) from C. sativa (8, 10, 20). Of note, nsLTPs sensitization can occur as a result of in vitro cross-reactivity to Can s 3 from taxonomically related or more distant sources without any previous Cannabis contact (20).

References

1.         Ocampo TL, Rans TS. Cannabis sativa: the unconventional "weed" allergen. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015;114(3):187-92.

2.         Davidson M, Reed S, Oosthuizen J, O'Donnell G, Gaur P, Cross M, et al. Occupational health and safety in cannabis production: an Australian perspective. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2018;24(3-4):75-85.

3.         Decuyper, II, Rihs HP, Van Gasse AL, Elst J, De Puysseleyr L, Faber MA, et al. Cannabis allergy: what the clinician needs to know in 2019. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2019;15(6):599-606.

4.         Rupasinghe HPV, Davis A, Kumar SK, Murray B, Zheljazkov VD. Industrial Hemp (Cannabis sativa subsp. sativa) as an Emerging Source for Value-Added Functional Food Ingredients and Nutraceuticals. Molecules. 2020;25(18).

5.         Jackson B, Cleto E, Jeimy S. An emerging allergen: Cannabis sativa allergy in a climate of recent legalization. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2020;16:53.

6.         Crini GL, E.; Chanet, G.; Morin-Crini, N. Applications of hemp in textiles, paper industry, insulation and building materials, horticulture, animal nutrition, food and beverages, nutraceuticals, cosmetics and hygiene, medicine, agrochemistry, energy production and environment: a review. Environmental Chemistry Letters. 2020;18:1451-76.

7.         Andre CM, Hausman JF, Guerriero G. Cannabis sativa: The Plant of the Thousand and One Molecules. Front Plant Sci. 2016;7:19.

8.         Ebo DG, Swerts S, Sabato V, Hagendorens MM, Bridts CH, Jorens PG, et al. New food allergies in a European non-Mediterranean region: is Cannabis sativa to blame? Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2013;161(3):220-8.

9.         Chatkin JM, Zani-Silva L, Ferreira I, Zamel N. Cannabis-Associated Asthma and Allergies. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2019;56(2):196-206.

10.       Decuyper I, Ryckebosch H, Van Gasse AL, Sabato V, Faber M, Bridts CH, et al. Cannabis Allergy: What do We Know Anno 2015. Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz). 2015;63(5):327-32.

11.       Sharma P, Murthy P, Bharath MM. Chemistry, metabolism, and toxicology of cannabis: clinical implications. Iran J Psychiatry. 2012;7(4):149-56.

12.       Khan BAW, P.; Wang, H. Antibacterial Properties of Hemp and Other Natural Fibre Plants: A Review. BioResources. 2014;9(2):3642-59.

13.       Decuyper, II, Green BJ, Sussman GL, Ebo DG, Silvers WS, Pacheco K, et al. Occupational Allergies to Cannabis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020;8(10):3331-8.

14.       de Meijer EP, Bagatta M, Carboni A, Crucitti P, Moliterni VM, Ranalli P, et al. The inheritance of chemical phenotype in Cannabis sativa L. Genetics. 2003;163(1):335-46.

15.       Bahji A, Stephenson C. International Perspectives on the Implications of Cannabis Legalization: A Systematic Review & Thematic Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(17).

16.       Bridgeman MB, Abazia DT. Medicinal Cannabis: History, Pharmacology, And Implications for the Acute Care Setting. P t. 2017;42(3):180-8.

17.       ITIS. Cannabis L. 2021 [cited 2021 June]. Available from: https://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=19108#null.

18.       Atakan Z. Cannabis, a complex plant: different compounds and different effects on individuals. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2012;2(6):241-54.

19.       Nayak AP, Green BJ, Sussman G, Berlin N, Lata H, Chandra S, et al. Characterization of Cannabis sativa allergens. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2013;111(1):32-7.

20.       Decuyper, II, Van Gasse AL, Faber MA, Elst J, Mertens C, Rihs HP, et al. Exploring the Diagnosis and Profile of Cannabis Allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019;7(3):983-9.e5.

21.       Decuyper I. Cannabis allergy & associated food allergies. The Netherlands: University of Antwerp; 2019.

22.       Armentia A, Castrodeza J, Ruiz-Muñoz P, Martínez-Quesada J, Postigo I, Herrero M, et al. Allergic hypersensitivity to cannabis in patients with allergy and illicit drug users. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr). 2011;39(5):271-9.

23.       Liskow B, Liss JL, Parker CW. Allergy to marihuana. Ann Intern Med. 1971;75(4):571-3.

24.       Hoffman BK, M.; Phillips, M.; Rabinovitch, N. Cannabis allergy in a young child with severe asthma exposed to secondhand marijuana smoke. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018;121:S82.

25.       McKee G, McClure S, Fyfe M, Stanwick R. Protecting the public from exposure to secondhand cannabis smoke and vapour following legalization. Can J Public Health. 2018;109(2):223-6.

26.       UN. World Drug Report 2020. 2: Drug Use and Health Consequences 2020 [updated June 2020; cited 2021 June]. Available from: https://wdr.unodc.org/wdr2020/en/drug-use-health.html.

27.       Han YY, Rosser F, Forno E, Celedón JC. Electronic vapor products, marijuana use, smoking, and asthma in US adolescents. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;145(3):1025-8.e6.

28.       Sussman GL, Beezhold DH, Cohn JR, Silvers WS, Zeiger JS, Nayak AP. Cannabis: An Emerging Occupational Allergen? Ann Work Expo Health. 2020;64(7):679-82.

29.       Alkhammash S, Tsui H, Thomson DMP. Cannabis and hemp seed allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019;7(7):2429-30.e1.

30.       Stadtmauer G, Beyer K, Bardina L, Sicherer SH. Anaphylaxis to ingestion of hempseed (Cannabis sativa). J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;112(1):216-7.

31.       Hemmings O, Kwok M, McKendry R, Santos AF. Basophil Activation Test: Old and New Applications in Allergy. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2018;18(12):77.

32.       Engler DBM, A. A.; Saraf, S. K.; Dargel, L. A., editor Severe Marijuana Allergy Controlled with Omalizumab. J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2013.

33.       Sub-Committee WIAN. Allergen Nomenclature: Cannabis sativa (Indian hemp): WHO; 2021 [cited 2021 August 18, 2021]. Available from: http://www.allergen.org/search.php?allergenname=&allergensource=cannabis+sativa&TaxSource=&TaxOrder=&foodallerg=all&bioname=.

34.       Gamboa P, Sanchez-Monge R, Sanz ML, Palacín A, Salcedo G, Diaz-Perales A. Sensitization to Cannabis sativa caused by a novel allergenic lipid transfer protein, Can s 3. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;120(6):1459-60.

35.       Armentia A, Herrero M, Martín-Armentia B, Rihs HP, Postigo I, Martínez-Quesada J. Molecular diagnosis in cannabis allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2014;2(3):351-2.

36.       Decuyper, II, Rihs HP, Mertens CH, Van Gasse AL, Elst J, De Puysseleyr L, et al. A new cannabis allergen in Northwestern Europe: The oxygen-evolving enhancer protein 2 (OEEP2). J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020;8(7):2421-4.e2.

37.       Ebo DG, Decuyper, II, Rihs HP, Mertens C, Van Gasse AL, van der Poorten MM, et al. IgE-binding and mast cell-activating capacity of the homologue of the major birch pollen allergen and profilin from Cannabis sativa. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021;9(6):2509-12.e3.